Search This Blog

Wednesday, December 21, 2005

Political Commentary by Hollywood Hacks?

It appears we have crossed a new threshhold in America's obsession with popular culture taking over for news. Even the local Albert Lea Tribune cannot resist the temptation of sensationalizing the news to sell newspapers.

Two of our esteemed political columnists are a comedian and a political satirist (definition: irony, sarcasm, or castic wit used to attach or expose folloy, vice, or stupidity. http://www.answers.com/satire&r=67). Let's call a spade a spade -- these folks do not deserve to be placed on a credible opinion page -- certainly not at the same time. Garrison Keillor, whose stories and voice enthral me -- has a political agenda. Here's an example of one of his tirades:
"The party of Lincoln and Liberty was transmogrified into the party of
hairy-backed swamp developers and corporate shills, faith-based economists,
fundamentalist bullies with Bibles, Christians of convenience, freelance
racists, misanthropic frat boys, shrieking midgets of AM radio, tax cheats,
nihilists in golf pants, brownshirts in pinstripes, sweatshop tycoons,
hacks,
fakirs, aggressive dorks, Lamborghini libertarians, people who
believe Neil
Armstrong’s moonwalk was filmed in Roswell, New Mexico, little
honkers out to
diminish the rest of us, Newt’s evil spawn and their
Etch-A-Sketch president, a
dull and rigid man suspicious of the free flow of
information and of secular
institutions, whose philosophy is a jumble of
badly sutured body parts trying to
walk. Republicans: The No.1 reason the
rest of the world thinks we’re deaf, dumb
and dangerous."
http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/were_not_in_lake_wobegon_anymore/


His resume is that he is extremely intelligent and spins a good yarn. I was actually enjoying Garrison Keillor's articles as he was keeping his comments away from politics. But, but . . .two liberal commedians on the same page. Please don't add Al Frankenstein to the editorial page!!

What about Will Durst? I was vaguely familiar with his name, but had to Google to really figure out who he was. One of my first hist hits was a webpage advertisting a video called "Voices of Dissent." Apparantly, Mr. Durst joined ranks with other well-known Hollywood "columnists" (described as "peace activists" on the website) such as Martin Sheen, Al Franken and Woody Harrelson. This video's tagline asks for buyers to view, "many of the surprising ways that Americans have found to express their views in dissent against the Bush administration policy of war in Iraq." http://www.voicesofdissent.us/Certainly, Mr. Durst appears to have obtained an informed view of his corner of the world from his home in California and he also tells a good joke. I do not question that these two columnist's are talented and are able to get their point across. However, do we really want to further "hollywoodize" how us mid-westerners obtain our political information?

Although, Mr. Durst does hail from Milwaukee, his comedy should probably appear on the comic page, not political opinion.

Imagine this conversation at the local Albert Lea coffee shop:Bernard: I hear President Bush is now trying to spin himself as an environmentalist. He's joining the "Green" party.James: No kidding. Where did you hear that?Bernard: From Will Durst!!James: Durst. Is that Crandall's neighbor?Bernard: No, No that's the guy from Comedy Central.James: Oh, I don't get CNN . . . cable prices just keep going up.Waitress [pouring 6th free refill]: I know who Durst is . . . he's that five-time emmy nominee that appears on PBS and NPR.James: Oh, I guess he does know what he's talking about.

Tuesday, December 06, 2005

What is intelligent design?

The concept of Intelligent Design seems to be getting a lot of attention. Interestingly enough, the attention seems to be coming from the liberals attempting to refute it, when most of us have no idea what it's about. That should be reason enough to take a closer look.

For an explanation of ID from the advocates themselves at the Discovery Institute.

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=3059&program=CSC&callingPage=discoMainPage

A Muslim's view of ID

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=3062&program=News&callingPage=discoMainPage

An easier read explanation of ID

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=3063&program=News&callingPage=discoMainPage

Friday, April 29, 2005

Minnesota has the lowest rate of uninsured in the country

Despite the noise in the traditional media and many individuals who criticize Republicans about anything and everything, Minnesota has the lowest rate of uninsured in the country. See attached AP article

Even the Star/Trib had to run the article... I believe on page 6 or 7.

For previously misplaced angst expressed by the Albert Lea Tribune editorial page click here

Monday, April 25, 2005

Senator Norm Coleman is definitely on to something

It appears that UN Secretary Kofi Annan is up to his ears in scandal. In a little reported incident in the mainstream media, a senior investigator in the UN's oil for food investigation resigned on "principle" in protest to the conduct of the investigation.


See attached AP article.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050424/D89LI1J00.html

Wednesday, April 13, 2005

What a beautiful Sunset

The Albert Lea City council did agree in February to sunset the storm water and lighting utility fees at the end of 2005. http://www.albertleatribune.com/articles/2005/02/15/news/news4.txt

Please watch, however, as technically they put a sunset on the fees, but not on the utilities themselves. The public has been promised that they will review these utilities at the end of the year and determine whether the property tax is the more appropriate location. Time will tell.

Also, this year's bonding bill is to include funding for some city projects. If these projects have been budgeted for in the city budget, will there be adjustments made to next year's budget process?

Thursday, March 31, 2005

Landlords are part of the Meth Solution

Opposition to “super-reporting” requirements in Meth Bill

To: The Governor and the State Legislature.

I have followed with interest the developments at the legislature in regards to the attempts to crack down on the statewide meth epidemic. I have become growingly concerned, however, with what I consider a gross over-legislation in this area.

I am admittedly a landlord and an attorney who represents numerous landlords in Freeborn County and therefore do have a vested interest in this issue. Likewise, I also represent many families who have been devastated by the destructive power of meth. I understand why it is easy and/or popular to get tough on this issue.

My concerns, however, stem from the need to maintain and promote affordable housing in communities; as well as providing many small real estate owners the ability to preserve the substantial investment they have made in rental property. I believe that it is easy to villanize landlords and promote a “punishment” philosophy rather than a cooperative free market approach. As I testified to in front of the Freeborn County Commissioners when they considered a similar County Ordinance:

“This is a community problem that requires a community response. Landlords are the front line of this defense. They should not be treated as if they are part of the problem. As a landlord and as an attorney who represents landlords, I find many parts of the proposed ordinances unacceptable. From a community perspective, those interested in continued economic growth should also be concerned. We are on the verge of an expected growth spurt in workers and business in our community. To create a hostile environment for landlords all but guarantees a limit on affordable housing in our community. Availability of affordable housing is a necessary pre-requisite to adding employment to our community.

* * *

The landlords are not the criminals and cannot realistically be expected to financially guarantee a drug-free rental property. Tenants rightfully enjoy legal protections to use their property without constant monitoring and harassment of their landlords or others. Addressing this community problem should require a community response.”

What I consider the greatest example of this over-zealousness is in regards to the “super reporting” provisions that have been included in the current version of H.F. No. 572 and S.F. 0423 (the “Meth Bill”). The Meth Bill provides for multiple provisions that are intended to protect the innocent tenant or property purchaser:

1. First, the Meth Bill requires that any property found to be contaminated be prohibited from being occupied until a department of health guideline clean up has occurred.

2. Second, the Meth Bill mandates that each local community health services administrator shall maintain and make available to the public a listing of the status of any meth contaminated property.

3. Third, the Meth Bill requires that all sellers of real property disclose whether meth has or has not occurred on the property.

4. Finally, the Meth Bill further mandates that an affidavit be filed against the property at the county recorder’s office, designating the property as a “Meth Lab Property”.

The super-reporting provision that I strongly advocate against is the last item listed above: the ability to record a Meth Lab Property affidavit with the County Recorder’s Office. Quite frankly, given the other three protections that are included in this legislation, this provision to me is unnecessary and constitutes a “punishment” provision to property owners. The title to a property is not the proper place for this designation.

If the intent of the Meth Bill is to protect innocent tenants, then the “no-occupation” order will prevent anyone from living at the property. As for property purchasers, the local department of health records and the mandatory disclosure provisions will protect the innocent property purchaser.

I have discussed this issue with many individuals and no one has been able to articulate why this “super-reporting” provision is necessary. Instead, I understand the Meth Lab Property Affidavit as an “extra” protection for the innocent tenant or purchaser. Such super reporting is not necessary for fire damage, flooded basements, sewage back up, chemical spills or even mold infestation and is unnecessary in this case.

I would request that the super-reporting provisions of this bill be eliminated.

Alternatively, I would request legislation to create a centralized database with the Minnesota Department of Health that would allow for designation of the location of a meth lab and a record of whether the meth lab has been cleaned in compliance with MDH guidelines.

I am also advocating for the Meth Bill to allow for innocent property owners to utilize the low-interest loans for clean-up purposes. I request that innocent property owners, having no notice of the clandestine activities should be eligible to utilize this money for clean up.

Without dragging out this issue I would simply state that undoubtedly private property owners would be more efficient in accomplishing the clean-up efforts than a government entity that will simply pass on the clean-up costs as an assessment against the property.

I fear that overzealous legislation in this area threatens to cool the rental market and put an unnecessary cap on a community’s capacity to enjoy economic growth.



For a link to the status of HF 572: http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/revisor/pages/search_status/status_detail.php?b=House&f=HF572&ssn=0&y=2005

For a link to the status of SF 0423: http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/revisor/pages/search_status/status_detail.php?b=Senate&f=SF0423&ssn=0&y=2005